Accurate and robust power quality disturbance (PQD) classification is critical for modern electrical grids, particularly in noisy environments. This study presents a comprehensive comparative evaluation of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for automatic PQD identification. The models evaluated include Support Vector Machines (SVM), Decision Trees (DT), Random Forest (RF), k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Dense Neural Networks (DNN). For experimentation, a hybrid dataset, comprising both synthetic and real signals, was used to assess model performance. The robustness of the models was evaluated by systematically introducing Gaussian noise across a wide range of Signal-to-Noise Ratios (SNRs). A central objective was to directly benchmark the practical implementation and performance of these models across two widely used platforms: MATLAB R2024a and Python 3.11. Results show that ML models achieve high accuracies, exceeding 95% at an SNR of 10 dB. DL models exhibited remarkable stability, maintaining 97% accuracy for SNRs above 10 dB. However, their performance degraded significantly at lower SNRs, revealing specific confusion patterns. The analysis underscores the importance of multi-domain feature extraction and adaptive preprocessing for achieving resilient PQD classification. This research provides valuable insights and a practical guide for implementing and optimizing robust PQD classification systems in real-world, noisy scenarios.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
José-Carlos Palomares-Salas
Sergio Aguado-González
José-María Sierra-Fernández
Applied Sciences
Universidad de Cádiz
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Palomares-Salas et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd91dafe798ba2fc499512 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910602
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: