The global expansion of Korean language education has created an urgent need for scalable, objective, and consistent methods for assessing the writing skills of non-native (L2) learners. Traditional manual grading is resource-intensive and prone to subjectivity, while existing Automated Essay Scoring (AES) systems often struggle with the linguistic nuances of Korean and the specific error patterns of L2 writers. This paper introduces a novel hybrid AES system designed specifically for Korean L2 writing. The system integrates two complementary feature sets: (1) a comprehensive suite of conventional linguistic features capturing lexical diversity, syntactic complexity, and readability to assess writing form and (2) a novel semantic relevance feature that evaluates writing content. This semantic feature is derived by calculating the cosine similarity between a student’s essay and an ideal, high-proficiency reference answer generated by a Large Language Model (LLM). Various machine learning models are trained on the Korean Language Learner Corpus from the National Institute of the Korean Language to predict a holistic score on the 6-level Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK) scale. The proposed hybrid system demonstrates superior performance compared to baseline models that rely on either linguistic or semantic features alone. The integration of the LLM-based semantic feature provides a significant improvement in scoring accuracy, more closely aligning the automated assessment with human expert judgments. By systematically combining measures of linguistic form and semantic content, this hybrid approach provides a more holistic and accurate assessment of Korean L2 writing proficiency. The system represents a practical and effective tool for supporting large-scale language education and assessment, aligning with the need for advanced AI-driven educational technology systems.
Hur et al. (Sun,) studied this question.