ABSTRACT This primer summarizes the contemporary debate in moral psychology about whether disgust plays a role in moral judgment, and what that role might be. The importance of the debate is explained, then several approaches to studying the issue are reviewed. First, I review experimental studies that induce incidental disgust. Then, I examine other approaches to studying this question, including correlational studies of disgust sensitivity, studies of whether disgust responds to moral content, and research on whether moral transgressions can evoke disgust. I then cast this debate in the philosophical framework of thesis‐antithesis‐synthesis, and present several possible ways of synthesizing conflicting findings and resolving the debate.
Justin F. Landy (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: