What type of study is this?

This is a Quantitative Study study.

October 9, 2025Open Access

First insights into the scale of invasions in African marine protected areas: leveraging global databases and citizen science data

SASarah Jane AcklandStellenbosch University DRDavid M. RichardsonUniversity of Bern TRTamara B. RobinsonStellenbosch University

Key Points

A total of 27 invasive species were recorded within 17 marine protected areas across seven African countries.
Utilizing data from global databases and citizen science enhances understanding of marine invasions in under-researched regions.
Nine MPAs were found to host species with significant impact levels, highlighting urgent management challenges.
Leveraging diverse data sources lays the groundwork for efficient monitoring programs to manage invasive species.

Abstract

Up-to-date information on the distribution of alien species is essential for evidence-based management. However, routine monitoring is resource intensive. This has led to regional biases in the availability of information on invasions, with little understanding of invasions in many developing regions, including Africa. This knowledge gap, particularly problematic for marine protected areas (MPAs), challenges the ability of African states to meet their obligations under the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) Target 6. This study drew on freely available global databases (Protected Planet; World Register of Introduced Marine Species; World Register of Marine Species) and citizen science data (iNaturalist) to provide novel insights into marine alien species in African MPAs. A total of 27 species were recorded within 17 MPAs across seven countries. The potential threat posed to these MPAs was assessed using the EICAT and SEICAT impact schemes. Worryingly, species known to have impacts of massive or major magnitude were documented in nine MPAs (Table Mountain National Park, Robben Island, Sixteen Mile Beach, Langebaan Lagoon, Namaqua National Park – all in South Africa); Namibian Islands (Namibia); Ilhas Formosa, Nago and Tchedia (Urok) (Guinea-Bissau); Banc d’Arguin National Park (Mauritania); Massa (Morocco)). When used in conjunction with curated databases, iNaturalist offered cost-effective and verifiable records of some alien species in under-surveyed MPAs. By leveraging data from disparate databases, this study improves our knowledge of the scale of invasions in African MPAs and provides a foundation upon which States can prioritise monitoring within their MPA networks. Ultimately, these data could support the development of targeted routine monitoring programmes which could assist the management of marine invasions and the attainment of GBF Target 6.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper