This article analyses how non-profit organisations define, measure, and achieve change across three interconnected levels: outputs, outcomes, and systemic impacts. Outputs capture immediate deliverables, outcomes encompass intermediate effects on people and institutions, and systemic impact reflects long-term transformation in policy and culture. The discussion highlights the methodological challenges of connecting micro-level interventions to macro-level change, emphasising the debate between attribution and contribution in impact evaluation. It critiques indicator-driven approaches that prioritise donor accountability over community relevance and examines unintended effects such as dependency or exclusion. Drawing on realist and developmental evaluation frameworks, the article advocates for adaptive, context-sensitive approaches that prioritise learning and participatory reflection. By reframing evaluation as an iterative process rather than a static measurement exercise, NGOs can demonstrate systemic contribution while aligning accountability with social transformation goals.
Anna Neya Kazanskaia (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: