Although nonprofit organisations have become increasingly visible in governance and policy debates, their influence is often constrained by structural, political, and organisational barriers. This article identifies six interrelated obstacles: limited resources and donor dependency, restrictive regulations, shrinking civic space, internal tensions between professionalisation and grassroots legitimacy, fragmentation within civil society, and systemic power asymmetries relative to governments and corporations. These constraints shape not only the scope but also the sustainability of advocacy. Drawing on global evidence, the article shows that nonprofit power is relational and contingent on institutional and political environments. For scholars, it advances a structural understanding of advocacy limitations; for practitioners, it provides strategies for resilience—diversifying funding, strengthening coalitions, and balancing accountability to both donors and communities. Ultimately, it argues that nonprofit influence cannot be assumed even in democratic settings and must be continuously negotiated through legitimacy, collaboration, and adaptability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Anna Neya Kazanskaia (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7f0af2d7e30942762c781 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-pblplcpwinfdsmk-06