We study the design of experiments with multiple treatment levels, a setting common in clinical trials and online A/B/n testing. Unlike single-treatment studies, practical analyses of multi-treatment experiments typically first select a winning treatment, and then only estimate the effect therein. Motivated by this analysis paradigm, we propose a design for MUlti-treatment experiments that jointly maximizes the accuracy of winner Selection and effect Estimation (MUSE). Explicitly, we introduce a single objective that balances selection and estimation, and determine the unit allocation to treatments and control by optimizing this objective. Theoretically, we establish finite-sample guarantees and asymptotic equivalence between our proposal and the Neyman allocation for the true optimal treatment and control. Across simulations and a real data application, our method performs favorably in both selection and estimation compared to various standard alternatives.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jiachen Xu
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Jian Qian
Central South University
Zijun Gao
Northwestern University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e997abe14057276da7f1cc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2510.04489
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: