This article examines the regulatory approach to self-preferencing by digital platforms in China, arguing for a lenient rather than stringent framework. Through comparative analysis of international casessuch as the EU s structural interventions and the behavioral remedies adopted in South Korea and the United Statesthe study highlights the risks of strict regulation in stifling innovation, disrupting ecosystem synergies, and undermining data-driven efficiency gains. It further explores how consumer heterogeneity, particularly between loyal and switching consumers, naturally constrains abusive self-preferencing. The article concludes that China should embrace conduct-based regulatory tools such as algorithmic transparency and cross-platform comparability to foster fair competition while preserving platform dynamism, aligning with both domestic market conditions and global digital governance trends.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chengxi Wu
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chengxi Wu (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68f04918e559138a1a06d488 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.ld27888
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: