Introduction. The article examines the dynamic nature of criminal liability and the role of data on a perpetrator of a crime in the process of its implementation. Three key stages of its development are identified: establishment, bringing to responsibility and implementation of criminal liability. It is emphasised that the volume and significance of information about a criminal reach their maximum at the final stage. Methods. The study used methods such as analysis, synthesis, generalisation, formal legal analysis, as well as the method of interpreting legal norms and a number of other documents. Results. The study of the functional relationship between data on a person who committed a crime and the system of criminal law measures led to the following conclusions: a) criminal law measures constitute a system of measures that can only be applied within the framework of criminal liability, and therefore exemption from criminal liability cannot be considered part of the system of criminal law measures; it represents the state’s refusal to enforce liability; b) with regard to a person who has committed a crime and who continues to pose a criminal threat, the following criminal law measures may be applied: punishment, suspended sentence, exemption from punishment in connection with a change in circumstances, deferral of punishment, deferral of serving a sentence for a drug addict, exemption from punishment with the application of educational measures or placement of a minor to a special custodial institution; c) data on the personality of a person who committed a crime reflect a wide range of his negative and positive characteristics, among which indicators of the level of public danger are leading in deciding on the need to implement criminal liability and on the choice of the form of its implementation.
Valentina N. Kufleva (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: