Abstract Characters—parts, properties, or activities of organisms—can be individuated in multiple, non-equivalent ways. This paper aims to show how these differences matter, to frame the problem of character individuation methodologically, and to outline a path to resolving it. I describe the main scientific roles for the character concept, and analyze three broad approaches to character individuation: functional, descriptive, and developmental. I explore which approaches are appropriate for which roles, and propose two evolutionary hypotheses to explain why functionally and developmentally individuated characters diverge.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
James DiFrisco
The Francis Crick Institute
Philosophy of Science
The Francis Crick Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
James DiFrisco (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68f43f03854d1061a58ac5f6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2025.10180