AI and trusteeship: operational assistance or something more?

Abstract In light of the ‘AI as a fiduciary’ hypothesis, this article refutes the possibility of AI assuming the role of trustee by highlighting the doctrinal limits that constrain its operation in the trust context, particularly those arising from trustee-specific and fiduciary duties. At the same time, it advances a normative argument that AI should be confined to a role of operational responsibility only, given the central importance of trustee discretion and judgment. At its core, this piece is concerned with trustee decision-making and offers practical guidance for the safe and responsible use of AI in trust administration.