Objective: Health education is critical in imparting health literacy to children and developing community health and wellbeing. The effectiveness of the teaching–learning interaction in health education classes depends on the teacher employing effective teaching methods, facilitating students’ deep understanding, critical thinking, and the development of skills, beliefs and attitudes that will be needed for them to cultivate healthy behaviours throughout their lives. Health education teaching differs from other learning areas as it addresses controversial and sensitive topics in class. Little research has been conducted regarding the preferred teaching methods of health educators and their ability to employ these teaching methods effectively in the classroom. Methods: In this paper, we present findings from a doctoral grounded theory study to explain the preferred teaching methods of teachers as they work with young people in the important learning area of health education. The study was conducted using a Chamazian constructivist grounded theory approach with the data being analysed using an inductive process, beginning with open codes and progressing to high-level categories. Main Results: This study determined that the preferred teaching method of the teachers delivering health education in Western Australia was discussion-based teaching. We examine the literature regarding discussion-based teaching methods, particularly in health education. Our findings evidence that teachers report preferring a discussion-based teaching approach, even though the health curriculum advises a critical inquiry approach and many schools in Australia currently promote an explicit teaching method. Conclusions: Teachers have expressed uncertainty as to how to effectively employ a discussion-based approach in class and have sought further clarification as they lead class discussions. Effective teaching practices need to be interrogated to support teachers, so how do we do this in a way that provides clarity for teachers and ultimately produces the best outcomes for young people?
Lockhart et al. (Tue,) studied this question.