Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Recent advancements in cancer multi-omics have transformed our understanding of cancer biology by integrating genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. These integrative approaches have led to the identification of novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets, offering deeper insights into the molecular intricacies of various cancers, including breast, lung, gastric, pancreatic, and glioblastoma. Despite these advances, challenges remain, such as the integration of disparate data types and the interpretation of complex biological interactions. However, developments in proteogenomics and mass spectrometry have enhanced the correlation between molecular profiles and clinical features, refining the prediction of therapeutic responses. Future research in cancer drug discovery is poised to benefit from multi-omics approaches, improving the precision and efficacy of personalized therapies. By developing integrative network-based models, researchers aim to address challenges related to heterogeneity, reproducibility, and data interpretation. A standardized framework for multi-omics data integration could revolutionize cancer research, optimizing the identification of novel drug targets and enhancing our understanding of cancer biology. This complete approach holds the promise of advancing personalized therapies by fully characterizing the molecular landscape of cancer, ultimately improving patient outcomes through more effective and targeted treatment strategies. This narrative review underscores the potential of multi-omics approaches to transform cancer research and improve patient outcomes through more precise and effective treatments.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Martina Catalano
Alberto D’Angelo
Francesco De Logu
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Clinical Medicine Insights Oncology
University of Florence
University of Trieste
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Catalano et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d786ad3fae90fd6048f939 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/11795549251384582
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: