Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In the 2000s and early 2010s, Brazil, Peru, and Chile experienced leftist electoral victories, reflecting the regional trend known as the Pink Tide. However,in the mid-2010s, the erosion of the popular support for left-wing governments interrupted this process, marking the start of a period of instability. Onthe one hand, in different countries, conservative forces managed to regainpower, renewing the impulse to marketization; on the other hand, left-wingparties kept their electoral strength, obtaining new victories after the late2010s and even opening the debate about a second left turn in the region.Although these electoral cycles in Brazil, Peru, and Chile reflected domesticpolitical conditions, they cannot be detached from Latin America’s position inthe hierarchy of global capitalism. This paper argues that the region’s integration into international trade and global finance has also shaped and subordinated political cycles, introducing varied constraints and opportunities fordomestic political actors. We show that during the first left turn, relatively stable inflows from the commodities boom and foreign direct investment allowedgovernments to implement progressive policies. However, recent left-wing governments have not experienced a similar commodities surge and had to relymore heavily on volatile, short-term financial inflows, posing significant challenges to these countries’ stability and policy space. We argue that the analysisof the trade, financial and political past of Latin American countries shouldserve them to change their path to avoid being trapped in shrinking wavesthat curb the space for autonomous development.
Bibi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: