Background: Accurate assessment of the severity of central canal stenosis (CCS) on lumbar spine MRI is critical for clinical decision-making. We evaluated deep learning models for automated CCS grading on sagittal T2-weighted MRI, focusing on uncertainty quantification to improve clinical reliability. Methods: Using a retrospective cohort from the LumbarDISC dataset (1,974 patients), we compared multiple deep learning architectures for three-level CCS classification (normal / mild, moderate, severe). To assess model confidence, Monte Carlo (MC) dropout and Test Time Augmentation (TTA) techniques were applied to quantify prediction uncertainty. Results: The fine-tuned Spinal Grading Network (SGN) achieved a balanced accuracy of 79.4% and a macro F1 score of 68.8%, with per-class accuracies of 71.3% for moderate and 78.5% for severe stenosis. MC dropout revealed an increase in uncertainty predominantly in moderate and severe cases, while TTA uncertainty was higher for mild stenosis. Conclusion: DL-based CCS grading demonstrates potential to assist radiologists by providing rapid, standardized evaluations. Incorporating uncertainty quantification offers a safeguard to flag ambiguous cases, thus supporting clinical trust and facilitating safer integration of AI tools into the interpretation of spine MRI.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Adriana Brenzikofer
María Monzón
Fabio Galbusera
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Brenzikofer et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68ff87d8c8c50a61f2bdc9fe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.24.25338153
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: