Conventional histories portray the Ottoman Darülfünun as a belated, derivative transplant of the European university. Drawing on historical contextualism and discourse analysis, this article reads the reform decrees, ministerial speeches, and by-laws that punctuated the school’s stop-start career as argumentative interventions—windows onto the problems late-Ottoman statesmen believed higher learning could solve and the futures they hoped to inhabit. Three intertwined logics surface: moralised expertise (science valid only when yoked to virtue), linguistic standardisation (Ottoman Turkish as the civic idiom of rule), and territorial patriotism (vatan re-imagined as dynastic homeland). Following the first proposal in 1845 to the Hamidian statute of 1900, these logics reveal how higher education shifted from a pragmatic method of crisis management to a durable methodology of governance, displaying an instance of a nationalizing empire. The Darülfünun endured until 1933, when it was recast as Istanbul University, carrying its imperial-national synthesis straight into the republican era. Its longevity shows that both late Ottoman and Kemalist regimes turned to higher learning to fuse technology, faith, and shared belonging into a single, durable strategy of state-building.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kevser Muratović
Culture, education and future.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kevser Muratović (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68ff87e2c8c50a61f2bdcfaa — DOI: https://doi.org/10.70116/2980274195
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: