Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Artificial intelligence is reshaping healthcare project management in Saudi Arabia, yet most deployments lack culturally grounded ethics. This paper synthesises global AI-ethics guidance and Islamic bioethics, then proposes a maqāṣid-al-sharīʿah-aligned conceptual framework for ANN-based decision support. Ethical signals derived from the preservation of life, dignity, justice, faith, and intellect are embedded as logic-gate filters on ANN outputs. The framework specifies a dual-metric evaluation that reports predictive performance (e.g., accuracy, MAE, AUC) alongside ethical compliance, with auditable thresholds for fairness (δ = 0.1) and confidence (α = 0.8) calibrated through stakeholder workshops. It incorporates a co-design protocol with clinicians, patients, Islamic scholars, and policymakers to ensure cultural and clinical legitimacy. Unlike UNESCO and EU frameworks, which remain principle-oriented, this study introduces a measurable dual-layer assessment that combines technical accuracy with ethical compliance, supported by audit artefacts such as model cards, traceability logs, and human override records. The framework yields technically efficient and Shariah-compliant recommendations and sets a roadmap for empirical pilots under Vision 2030. The paper moves beyond a general review by formalising an Islamic-values-driven conceptual framework that operationalises ethical constraints inside ANN–DSS pipelines and defines auditable compliance metrics. This paper combines a critical review of AI in healthcare project management with the development of a maqāṣid-aligned conceptual framework, thereby bridging systematic synthesis with an implementable proposal for ethical AI.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hawazin Alotaibi
Wamadeva Balachandran
Ziad Hunaiti
AI
Brunel University of London
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alotaibi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/694033c32d562116f29076cc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6120307