Satellite altimeters provide global observations of significant wave height (SWH, in m), yet buoy-based validation is affected by representativeness errors and sampling mismatches. This study develops a consistent framework for validating and scaling HY-2B SWH that integrates nearest-point spatiotemporal collocation, sea-state-binned diagnostics, three complementary calibration schemes (bias correction, ordinary least-squares (OLS) linear regression scaling, and machine-learning residual correction), and Extended Triple Collocation (ETC) for sensor-independent uncertainty estimates. The dataset includes HY-2B SWH, National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) buoy records, seven buoys in the Taiwan Strait, and the sea surface significant wave height (VHM0, in m) from the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS) Global Wave Reanalysis. Sensitivity tests show that tightening the collocation radius from 100 to 25 km reduces scatter (RMSE/STD) while preserving near-zero bias; correlations remain ≥0.97 for 25–50 km but degrade at larger windows, underscoring representativeness effects. Error metrics increase monotonically with sea state, whereas mean biases remain small. ETC applied to HY-2B, NDBC, and CMEMS yields random error standard deviations of 0.158, 0.147, and 0.179 m, respectively, with squared correlation coefficients (ρ2) of approximately 0.96–0.98 for all systems. Scaling experiments reveal a data-quality-dependent behavior: for NDBC matchups, HY-2B already agrees closely with buoys (e.g., RMSE ≈ 0.24 m), and additional scaling brings no benefit; for the Taiwan Strait buoys, all three schemes improve agreement (RMSE ≈ 0.41 m; correlation ≈ 0.95), with the residual machine-learning model providing the largest reduction in random error. The results support a practical protocol for HY-2B SWH validation: a 30 min/25–50 km window, modest outlier screening, and selective use of linear or residual corrections depending on buoy network and environment.
Yang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.