What type of study is this?

This is a Meta-Analysis study (also classified as: Systematic Review).

November 27, 2025Patient Safety in Surgery4 citationsOpen Access

Incidence and predictors of failed spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

SZSitotaw Tesfa Zegeye SBSamuel Debas Bayable

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The failure rate of spinal anesthesia is significant. Our findings highlight the importance of standardized techniques, optimization of local anesthetic dosage, and continuous training to reduce failures, particularly in resource-limited settings. Key associated factors considered to reduce failures.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zegeye et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/694030102d562116f2905e77 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-025-00457-9

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Failed Spinal Anesthesia: Incidence and Associated Factors2024 · 2 citations
2Type, management, and associated factors of failed spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. Prospective cohort study2022 · 9 citations
3Failed Obstetric Spinal Anesthesia in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital2015 · 24 citations
4Total failure of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, associated factors, and outcomes: A retrospective case–control study2022 · 13 citations
5Approach to failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section2018 · 41 citations

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper