Abstract Egypt’s historical development between the two world wars represents an interesting case of gradual decolonisation. Many historians have emphasised how Britain continued to exercise power over local Egyptian administration following the country’s conditional independence in 1922. This article explores the role of Britain in managing urban domestic policy questions in Egypt and, in particular, the response of British officials to one of the most serious political crises of the inter-war period, the Alexandria Corniche Scandal. A local dispute over contractors’ payments revealed a web of incompetence and corruption that contributed to the downfall of a prime minister and the disgrace of British engineers. The response of the British High Commissioner and British officials in the Egyptian government revealed the difficulties that colonial officials had in managing domestic Egyptian affairs and their weakness in the face of Egyptian politicians with a strong local political base. Unable to build effective political alliances and to unite the Alexandrian European community behind a vision of local government reform, senior British officials were unable to shape the future of local administration in Egypt or obtain any of their core political objectives. The case has important wider implications as it highlights the declining influence of the British over Egyptian domestic affairs and how the issue of corruption could be used to challenge the image of competent and sophisticated colonial oversight. It also demonstrates some of the difficulties Britain faced in managing the long-term process of decolonisation in the face of competing local political interests.
James Moore (Tue,) studied this question.