What type of study is this?

This is a Literature Review study.

December 5, 2025Open Access

Are water-related nature-based solutions (NbS) assessed for their full multi-benefit potential? A review from an urban perspective

EDEmmanuel Dubois TLTaha Loghmani-KhouzaniInstitute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources SOSusanna Ottaviani

Key Points

Performance assessments of nature-based solutions often lack comprehensive multi-benefit evaluation, indicating gaps.
The review of over 100 scientific studies highlights fragmented approaches to assessing sustainability and resilience.
Evaluation methods are constrained by limited stakeholder involvement and challenges in applying global frameworks.
Transdisciplinary collaboration and citizen science are essential for developing effective assessment tools for urban water management.

Abstract

Abstract Nature-based solutions (NbS) leverage natural processes to address societal and environmental challenges. In recent years, they have gained significant global attention as integrated strategies that enhance resilience and sustainability amid global change. NbS are particularly relevant in complex and rapidly evolving urban environments, where water management is critical for mitigating hazards and preserving resources. However, assessing NbS performance remains challenging due to their multidisciplinary nature and local socio-geographical dependencies. This study presents a systematic literature review to evaluate whether current water-related NbS performance assessments adequately capture their full range of benefits within urban environments. Based on an analysis of 111 peer-reviewed scientific studies, this review examines: (1) the backgrounds of experts reporting on NbS and the types of NbS assessed, (2) existing evaluation methods, (3) the extent to which global interconnected challenges, such as climate change and water resiliency, are addressed, and (4) the involvement of stakeholders and citizens in NbS methodologies. Key findings indicate that assessment parameters collectively address multiple benefits but remain fragmented and narrowly focused, highlighting the lack of genuinely integrated multi-benefit assessments. This was related to the fact that most researchers interested in NbS performance assessment were concentrated in a few research areas and relied on a limited number of parameters, while stakeholder involvement remained very limited. Frameworks addressing global interconnected challenges (i.e., the SDGs and Resource Nexus) also proved difficult to apply as evaluation tools. It was identified that incorporating citizen science can fill empirical data gaps and strengthen post-implementation assessments while enhanced transdisciplinary collaboration across scientific, policy, and community domains is crucial for developing comprehensive assessment frameworks. As the first comprehensive synthesis dedicated to performance assessment methods for water-related NbS in urban settings, this review establishes a benchmark for the field. Researchers, policymakers, and practitioners are encouraged to collaborate in advancing NbS and translating these insights into action.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper