Abstract Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) targeting CD19 have shown promising benefits to patients of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL) with limited response to conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapies, but only one-third patients got durable remission and the resistance mechanisms were complicated. CAR-T cells targeting CD22 were found to be effective in patients who failed previous anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy. In this prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR-T cell therapy (CAR2219) in patients with R/R LBCL. Methods: Till February 28, 2025, this ongoing phase 2 clinical trial have enrolled 31 patients with R/R LBCL, and all were evaluable for efficacy and safety profiles. All patients were treated with CAR2219, which consisted of a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) derived from the anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody fused to a second scFv derived from the anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody, followed by fusion of the scFv domains to the hingeand transmembrane domain of human CD8α, and the cytoplasmic signaling domains of human 4-1BB and CD3ζ, and parallel tEGFR expression was used to detect the expression efficiency of CAR. This bispecific CAR was encoded by a third-generation self-inactivating lentiviral vector under the control of an elongation factor 1 alpha (EF1-α) promoter. Bridging therapy was allowed at the choice of the treating physicians. A 3-day lymphodepletion (cyclophosphamide: 250 mg/m2/d; fludarabine: 25 mg/m2/d) was followed by an intravenous dose of CAR2219 (2×10e6/kg). For patients who responded to CAR2219 therapy, maintenance therapy using PD-1 inhibitors, XPO1 inhibitors, BTK inhibitors, or HDAC inhibitors were also allowed. The primary endpoint was best overall response rate (ORR) as of 3 months post-CAR-T cells infusion. The secondary endpoints included best complete response rate (CRR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AE). We defined PFS as the time from CAR-T cells infusion to disease progression or death from any cause. Results: 14 male and 17 female patients with R/R LBCL were enrolled, with a median age of 53 years old (range 22-81), and all had undergone a median of three (range 3-7) prior lines of therapy. 23/31 patients were refractory to previous last line of therapy. The median IPI score was 4 (range 1-5) at the time of CAR-T cell therapy, and 17/31 patients had more than two extranodal sites invasion. CAR2219 was successfully manufactured and infused to all 31 patients. As of June 30, 2025, with a median follow-up of 8. 1 months after CAR-T cells infusion, the best ORR was 100%, comprising a CRR of 64. 5% and a partial response (PR) rate of 35. 5%. The median PFS and OS were not reached. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for 12-month PFS and OS rates were 60. 4% 0. 441-0. 827 and 87. 1% 0. 761-0. 997, respectively. Regarding safety, the most common AEs included neutropenia (93. 5%), thrombocytopenia (77%), and anemia (71%). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 74% of patients, with no grade 3 or higher events. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 6% of patients, with only one case of grade 3. Tocilizumab and corticosteroids were effective in managing CRS and ICANS, and no treatment-related deaths were reported. In this study, peak expansion of CAR-T cells occurred between days 10 and 14 post-infusion in 90% of patients, with a median peak CAR-T cell count of 2. 35×10⁸/L. Following CAR-T therapy, 71% of patients received maintenance therapy, which primarily included PD-1 inhibitors (73%), XPO1 inhibitors (45%), BTK inhibitors (23%), and HDAC inhibitors (23%). Conclusion: CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR-T cell therapy demonstrated impressive efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with R/R LBCL. This trial is still ongoing. (ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT06081478)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yong Liang
Jia Cong
Liang Wang
Blood
Capital Medical University
Beijing Tongren Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69362f514fa91c937236d931 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-570