Air quality prediction is a critical challenge amid rising environmental and health risks from pollution. This study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) to compare traditional statistical models and machine learning (ML) techniques applied to air quality forecasting. Following the PRISMA 2020 protocol, 412 peer-reviewed articles (2016–2025) were analyzed using thematic filters and bibliometric tools. Results show a marked shift toward ML methods, particularly in Asia (73.2%), with limited representation from Latin America and Africa. Statistical models focused mainly on MLR (88.6%) and ARIMA (11.4%), while ML approaches (n = 574) included Random Forest, LSTM, and SVM. Only 12% of studies conducted direct comparisons. A total of 1177 predictor variables and 307 performance metrics were systematized, highlighting PM2.5, NO2, and RMSE. Hybrid models like CNN-LSTM show strong potential but face challenges in implementation and interpretability. This review proposes a consolidated framework to guide future research toward more explainable, adaptive, and context-aware predictive models.
Peinado et al. (Thu,) studied this question.