AbstractBased on the established theoretical framework of "particle deterministic state and short-range repulsion-medium-range attraction" (Zenodo, September 26, 2025, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17209640), this study for the first time establishes "observation energy interference" as the core physical quantity for quantitative regulation of particle paths, and constructs a universal quantitative model of "observation energy deviation (ΔE) → particle force change (ΔF) → path offset (Δx)". By integrating authoritative experimental data from institutions such as CERN, MIT, and the Institute of Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, path response formulas for different particles in conventional and extreme environments (strong magnetic fields, low temperatures, medium and high pressures) are derived and verified. The results show that when the observation energy deviation is controlled within 0.01 eV, the particle path offset can be limited to less than 0.05 μm, and the path repeatability is improved from 85% to over 99%. This model advances quantum path theory from the level of phenomenon explanation to precise prediction and active control, providing directly applicable engineering basis for the stable control of quantum chip qubits and the design of extreme environment detectors, and realizing a key supplement to existing quantum theories. 摘要基于已建立的“粒子确定态与短程排斥-中程吸引”理论框架(Zenodo,2025年9月26日,DOI:10.5281/zenodo.17209640),本研究首次将“观测能量干扰”确立为粒子路径定量调控的核心物理量,构建了“观测能量偏差(ΔE)→粒子受力变化(ΔF)→路径偏移(Δx)”的普适定量模型。通过整合欧洲核子研究中心(CERN)、麻省理工学院(MIT)、中国科学院物理研究所等机构的权威实验数据,推导并验证了不同粒子在常规及极端环境(强磁场、低温、中高压)下的路径响应公式。结果表明,当观测能量偏差控制在0.01 eV以内时,粒子路径偏移可限制在0.05 μm以下,路径重复性从85%提升至99%以上。该模型将量子路径理论从现象解释层面推进到精确预测与主动控制层面,为量子芯片量子比特的稳定控制、极端环境探测器的设计提供了可直接应用的工程依据,实现了对现有量子理论的关键补充。
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bian Zhenfeng
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bian Zhenfeng (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6925198ec0ce034ddc3535d5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17613439
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: