This article proposes a methodological framework that combines a Q-concourse questionnaire with Multiple Factor Analysis and Hierarchical Clustering on Principal Components (MFA/HCPC) to derive discourse typologies from large-N survey data. The framework offers four advantages. First, the Q-concourse translates naturally occurring statements into survey items, importing the contextual richness of qualitative discourse analysis into a quantitative design. Second, MFA reduces dimensionality while weighting thematically defined item blocks equally, preventing any correlated subset of variables from dominating the solution and preserving within-block covariance patterns. Third, HCPC scales efficiently to large samples, exploring up to 2ᵏ multidimensional configurations and thus overcoming the combinatorial limits of traditional Q-methodology. Fourth, by locating each respondent within the clustered factor space, HCPC links individual viewpoints to coherent narrative patterns, enabling precise reconstruction and extrapolation of discourse structures. The framework’s utility is illustrated with a national survey on human-genome editing in Australia.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Veri, Francesco
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Veri, Francesco (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/692502b787af00ed34ac212e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-280072
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: