Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
CODES Framework ABSTRACT Human knowledge is typically described as a linear progression from observation to theory. Historical evidence, cognitive science, and structural analysis suggest that this view is incomplete. Knowledge emerges through a recursive process that begins in symbolic form—fiction, metaphor, narrative, myth—long before formalization becomes possible. This paper proposes Symbolic Pre-Formalism: a rare cognitive mechanism through which individuals express early, partial structures of future theories in symbolic media. These symbolic forms act as compressed prototypes, enabling contradiction-tolerant representation before logical or mathematical articulation is available. The theory integrates classical epistemological models (Plato, Aristotle, Kant, Peirce, Popper, Kuhn, Polanyi, Lakatos) with contemporary insights from cognitive architecture, compression-based reasoning, developmental cognition, and recursive self-reference. Case studies from Goethe, Jung, Borges, Lem, Hesse, and others illustrate the symbolic-to-formal transition across history. The paper then synthesizes these insights into a unified model of six knowledge-emergence modes: sensory compression, symbolic pre-formalism, drift-correction learning, recursive self-reference, social distribution, and deterministic formalization. The resulting framework reframes creativity, scientific discovery, and cognitive development as deterministic, coherence-seeking processes rather than stochastic events. Symbolic forms hold and preserve early structure; formal systems complete it. This unified model clarifies how insight arises, how symbolic narratives anticipate future conceptual frameworks, and why the symbolic → formal recursion is a universal yet uncommon mode of human cognition.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bostick, Devin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bostick, Devin (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/694035fb2d562116f29095e0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17717319
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: