Microplastics (MPs)—synthetic polymer particles less than 5 mm in size—have emerged as ubiquitous contaminants in terrestrial and aquatic environments worldwide, raising concerns about their ecological and human health impacts. While research has predominantly focused on urban and marine settings, evidence shows that rural ecosystems are also affected, challenging assumptions of pristine conditions outside cities and coasts. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the presence, pathways, and impacts of MPs in rural environments, highlighting complex contamination dynamics driven by both local sources (agricultural plastics, domestic waste, rural wastewater, and road runoff) and regional processes (atmospheric deposition, hydrological transport, and sediment transfer). Key findings highlight that rural lakes, streams, soils, and groundwater systems are active sinks and secondary sources of diverse MPs, predominantly polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in fibrous and fragmented forms. These particles vary in size, density, and color, influencing their transport, persistence, and bioavailability. Ecological effects include bioaccumulation in freshwater species, soil degradation, and potential food chain transfer, while human exposure risks stem from contaminated groundwater, air, and locally produced food. Despite these growing threats, rural systems remain underrepresented in monitoring and policy frameworks. The article calls for context-specific mitigation strategies, enhanced wastewater treatment, rural waste management reforms, and integrated microplastics surveillance across environmental compartments.
Bhowmik et al. (Sun,) studied this question.