Reverse-dipper hypertension was associated with a 50% higher heart rate detection rate compared to dipper hypertension, indicating worse autonomic regulation.
Does the diurnal blood pressure pattern (dipper vs. non-dipper vs. reverse-dipper) associate with heart rate variability and the risk of hypertensive retinopathy in patients with essential hypertension?
181 patients with essential hypertension (aged 20-70 years, 88 males/93 females). Excluded: secondary hypertension, severe cardiac, hepatic, or renal dysfunction, acute cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events within 3 months, thyroid dysfunction, pregnancy, shift workers, and cognitive impairment.
Diurnal blood pressure patterns assessed via 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (categorized as dipper, non-dipper, or reverse-dipper based on nocturnal systolic blood pressure fall rate).
Comparison among the three diurnal blood pressure patterns (dipper vs. non-dipper vs. reverse-dipper).
Detection rate of hypertensive retinopathy (diagnosed via fundus examination) and heart rate variability (HRV) indices (derived from 24-hour ambulatory ECG).surrogate
Non-dipper and reverse-dipper blood pressure patterns are associated with worse autonomic regulation and a significantly higher risk of hypertensive retinopathy compared to the dipper pattern.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
To investigate the association of different diurnal blood pressure patterns with heart rate variability (HRV) and hypertensive retinopathy (HR) risk in essential hypertension patients. A total of 181 patients (Jan 2023-Jun 2025) were grouped by nocturnal systolic blood pressure fall rate (SBPF): dipper (n = 57, 10%≤SBPF < 20%), non-dipper (n = 62, 0 ≤ SBPF < 10%), reverse-dipper (n = 62, SBPF < 0%). Ambulatory blood pressure (BP), HRV indices, and HR detection rate were compared. Reverse-dipper had higher nocturnal SBP (nSBP), 24-hour SBP (24hSBP) than the other two groups (all P < 0.05), and higher nocturnal DBP (nDBP) than dipper (P = 0.002). Dipper's HRV indices (SDNN, SDANN, RMSSD, PNN50, LF, HF) were better than non-dipper (P < 0.05); SDNN, SDANN, LF were better than reverse-dipper (all P < 0.001). Reverse-dipper's LF/HF was lower than others (P < 0.05). HR detection rates: 3.5% (dipper), 46.8% (non-dipper), 50.0% (reverse-dipper) (P < 0.001). Multivariable regression: BMI (OR = 1.131) was an independent risk factor; dipper (vs. reverse-dipper, OR = 0.031) was protective (P < 0.05). Reverse-dipper has the highest nocturnal BP load, dipper the most favorable (better autonomic regulation). Ambulatory BP monitoring and BMI control are crucial to reduce target organ damage.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fengping Gong
Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Hui Li
Beijing Normal University
Tianfeng Huang
Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Scientific Reports
Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
117th Hospital of People's Liberation Army
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gong et al. (Mon,) reported a other. Reverse-dipper hypertension was associated with a 50% higher heart rate detection rate compared to dipper hypertension, indicating worse autonomic regulation.
synapsesocial.com/papers/696321d491e05aa366cb8194 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-29694-9
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: