What question did this study set out to answer?

To explore adversarial collaboration as a method for enhancing credibility in biomedical science.

January 6, 2026

Adversarial Collaboration as a Strategy for Credible Biomedical Science

DKDavid KentTufts University JIJohn P. A. IoannidisInnovative Research (United States)

Key Points

To explore adversarial collaboration as a method for enhancing credibility in biomedical science.
Examined the concept of adversarial collaboration
Discussed the roles of opposing investigators and neutral arbiters
Analyzed implications for study design and publication
Adversarial collaboration can lead to more credible biomedical research
Neutral arbitrators help in reducing bias in studies
Collaboration between opposing viewpoints fosters robust scientific discourse.

Abstract

This Viewpoint examines adversarial collaboration—bringing investigators with opposing views to design, analyze, and publish studies together, often with a neutral arbiter—as a strategy for credible biomedical science.

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kent et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/695d8e5f3483e917927a580f https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.23911

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper