Background: Cardiovascular risk models, such as the Framingham and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) calculators, have improved risk prediction but often fail to identify individuals who experience ASCVD events despite low or intermediate predicted risk. This suggests that underrecognized, non-traditional risk factors may contribute significantly to the development of atherosclerosis. Objective: This narrative review synthesizes and summarizes recent evidence on high-yield non-traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis, with a focus on clinically significant, emerging, and applicable contributors beyond conventional frameworks. This review is distinct in that it aggregates a wide array of non-traditional risk factors while also consolidating recent data on ASCVD in more vulnerable populations. Unlike the existing literature, this manuscript integrates in a single comprehensive review various domains of non-traditional atherosclerotic risk factors, including inflammatory, metabolic, behavioral, environmental, and physical pathways. An additional unique highlight in the same manuscript is the discussion of non-traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis in more vulnerable populations, specifically South Asians. We also focus on clinically actionable factors that can guide treatment decisions for clinicians. Results: Key non-traditional risk factors identified include inflammation and biomarker-based risk factors such as C-reactive protein or interleukin-6 levels, metabolic and microbial risk factors, behavioral factors such as E-cigarette use, and environmental or infectious risk factors such as air and noise pollution. We explore certain physical exam findings associated with atherosclerotic burden, such as Frank’s sign and Achilles tendon thickness. Conclusions: Atherosclerosis is a multifactorial process influenced by diverse and often overlooked factors. Integrating non-traditional risks into clinical assessment may improve early detection, guide prevention and personalize care. Future risk prediction models should incorporate molecular, behavioral, and environmental data to reflect the complex nature of cardiovascular disease.
Yu et al. (Sun,) studied this question.