Context: The main obstacle of quantum computing on its way to scalability is the noisy nature of current hardware. Various types of errors lead to incorrect computational results, and measures such as quantum error mitigation are needed to counteract these errors. Many error mitigation techniques require a thorough understanding of the noise and its impact on computations. Therefore, accurate noise models are indispensable to facilitate meaningful quantum computing in the near future. They also enable realistic simulations of quantum devices. Since these devices are currently limited and quantum computing is expensive, researchers typically rely on simulations for testing their algorithms. Objective: In this thesis, we aim to construct a realistic noise model for quantum computing and optimise its model parameters. The model construction should build on the underlying physical processes, and the number of parameters should scale well with the system size. We also address the evaluation and comparison of different noise models by benchmarks using quantum circuits specific to real-world applications. Finally, we aim to develop useful graphical representations of noise models based on the existing quantum circuit model. Method: We present a benchmarking framework for quantum computing noise models and evaluate it based on benchmarking quality attributes from the literature. Moreover, we construct a quantum computing noise model and develop a training procedure for its parameters. We analyse the parameters of the trained noise model and the impact ofdifferent types of errors on computations. We benchmark the noise model with the above approach and compare it to a noise model provided by IBM’s software development kit Qiskit. Finally, we develop an extension of the quantum circuit model to represent noise channels. Result: The benchmarks performed in this thesis show that our noise model predicts noisy hardware behaviour of IBM’s ibmqₘanila quantum device equally well as the Qiskit model, if not better, based on quantum circuits commonly used for variational quantum algorithms. Within the trained noise model, readout error has the most detrimental impact on computations. Our benchmarking approach satisfies relevant quality criteria by choosing suitable quantum circuits and objective functions to compare model predictionsto hardware data. Moreover, the quantum circuit model can be extended meaningfully by noise channels. Conclusion: Our benchmarking approach is suitable for evaluating and comparing quantum computing noise models. In future work, volumetric benchmarks should be performed for various noise models and application contexts. The parameter optimisation based on learning with training circuits yields accurate noise models and shows the importance of mitigating measurement error. Different optimisation algorithms and quantum circuits should be explored, and more types of noise should be incorporated into the noise model.
Tom Weber (Mon,) studied this question.