The broader aim of this research is to examine how Learning Analytics (LA) can become ethically sound, pedagogically actionable, and realistically adopted in educational practice. To address this overarching challenge, the study investigates three interrelated research questions: ethics by design, learning impact, and adoption conditions. Methodologically, the research follows an exploratory sequential multi-method design. First, a meta-synthesis of 53 studies is conducted to identify key ethical challenges in LA and to derive an ethics-by-design framework. Second, a quasi-experimental study examines the impact of interface-based LA guidance (strong versus minimal) on students’ self-regulated learning skills and academic performance. Third, a mixed-methods adoption study, combining surveys, focus groups, and ethnographic observations, investigates the factors that encourage or hinder teachers’ adoption of LA in K–12 education. The findings indicate that strong LA-based guidance leads to statistically significant improvements in students’ self-regulated learning skills and academic performance compared to minimal guidance. Furthermore, the adoption analysis reveals that performance expectancy, social influence, human-centred design, and positive emotions facilitate LA adoption, whereas effort expectancy, limited facilitating conditions, ethical concerns, and cultural resistance inhibit it. Overall, the study demonstrates that ethics by design, effective pedagogical guidance, and adoption conditions are mutually reinforcing dimensions. It argues that LA can support intelligent, responsive, and human-centred learning environments when ethical safeguards, instructional design, and stakeholder involvement are systematically aligned.
Tzimas et al. (Wed,) studied this question.