The Born rulethe prescription that measurement probabilities equal the squared mod- ulus of wave function amplitudeshas resisted satisfactory explanation for nearly a century. We argue that this diculty stems from a hidden assumption: that probability names a causal concept requiring causal explanation. Drawing on causal eliminativism, we reinterpret the Born rule not as describing the probabilistic eects of measurement, but as specifying a measure on the space of constraint-satisfying congurations. From this perspective, Glea- son's theorem does not derive probability from quantum mechanics; rather, it identies |ψ|2 as the unique coherent measure compatible with Hilbert space geometry. The question Why does measurement cause probabilistic outcomes? dissolves: there is no causation, hence no probabilistic causation, hence no puzzle. What remains is a geometric fact about constraint structure
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ryuhei ISHIBASHI
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ryuhei ISHIBASHI (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/696b26b2d2a12237a934a01a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18256778