As a critical carbon offset mechanism, China’s Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) plays a pivotal role in achieving the “dual carbon” targets. With the relaunch of its trading market, refining the CCER valuation framework has become imperative. This study develops a multidimensional CCER valuation methodology based on both the income and market approaches. Under the income approach, two probabilistic models—discrete and continuous emission distribution frameworks—are proposed to quantify CCER value. Under the market approach, a Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) model and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network model are constructed to capture nonlinear temporal dynamics in CCER pricing. Through a systematic comparative analysis of the outputs and methodologies of these models, this study identifies optimal pricing strategies to enhance CCER valuation. Results reveal significant disparities among models in predictive accuracy, computational efficiency, and adaptability to market dynamics. Each model exhibits distinct strengths and limitations, necessitating scenario-specific selection based on data availability, application context, and timeliness requirements to strike a balance between precision and efficiency. These findings offer both theoretical and practical insights to support the development of the CCER market.
Tang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: