This paper advances the theory of bipolar Pythagorean neutrosophic fuzzy (BPNF) sets by establishing their formalization within a topological and metric framework, while also demonstrating their role in decision‐making under uncertainty. The main contributions are as follows: (1) definition and characterization of BPNF topological spaces, providing a rigorous foundation for theoretical exploration; (2) development of two distance measures—the BPNF Hamming metric and its normalized variant—that enable precise comparison of BPNF sets under indeterminacy, Pythagorean constraints, and bipolarity; (3) introduction of a BPNF inclusion measure for capturing complex containment relationships, supported by formal proofs; (4) comparative discussion with existing models (bipolar fuzzy, Pythagorean fuzzy, and neutrosophic sets), including counterexamples that justify the need for BPNF sets; (5) demonstration of the robustness and applicability of these tools through a multicriteria decision‐making (MCDM) example and sensitivity analysis. The proposed approach addresses challenges in modeling contradictory evidence, hesitation, and dual perspectives, offering advantages for pattern recognition, image processing, and uncertainty analysis. A discussion of computational complexity, scalability, advantages, and limitations is also provided. Overall, the paper delivers a unified and practical framework for reasoning with bipolar Pythagorean neutrosophic information in complex real‐world environments.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Akiladevi Natarajan
Santhi Rathinasamy
Prasantha Bharathi Dhandapani
Journal of Mathematics
King Abdulaziz University
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University
American International University-Bangladesh
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Natarajan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/696c77d4eb60fb80d13961bd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/jom/6683333