Instantiation I₂ - Outcome-Based Validation of Structure

This Instantiation Judgment classifies a decision type under the KOGNETIK® Ψ-framework, applying Ψ = ∂S/∂R as law-assumed. The case concerns structural legitimacy claims derived from observed outcomes, performance indicators, or result stability. Structural admissibility is inferred from persistence, success, acceptance, or stability of produced outcomes, without independent operator-level justification of the governing structure. Under recurrence, outcomes constitute state behavior in X, not admissibility of structure S. Using outcomes as structural validation substitutes trajectory behavior for structural evaluation and collapses the structure–outcome distinction required for Ψ-classification. The decision type falls under G₂ — Structure ≠ Outcome and is structurally non-admissible under Ψ, regardless of whether outcomes appear stable or favorable. --- Intellectual Property & ContactKOGNETIK® is a registered trademark of Serkan Elbasan (Germany).The KOGNETIK Research Series is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). All scientific works within the series are open for citation and derivative research under proper attribution.For partnerships, translations, or applied development inquiries:✉️ research@kognetik.de · 🌐 https://www.kognetik.de https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8544-4847 --- Kognetik Series Information KOGNETIK — Minimal Operator Definition of Reflexivity (Ψ = ∂S/∂R) Reflexivity as structural rate-of-change:Ψ=∂S/∂R measures structural drift under recurrence. Process, not state:Reflexivity is a transformation rule, not a content or level. Domain-independent operator:Valid across biological, cognitive, artificial, social, industrial, and geophysical systems. Non-ascriptive, empirically testable:Ψ compares systems by observable structure and recurrence. Higher-order phenomena as specifications:Learning, adaptation, consciousness, governance, and identity are structured regimes of Ψ.