This article conducts a bibliometric analysis of 816 Games and Culture publications (2006–2025) indexed in Scopus to explore how specialized journals shape the institutionalization of interdisciplinary fields. Through citation networks, keyword co-occurrence, authorship, and geographic analyses, it treats the journal as a model of scholarly infrastructure in game studies. Results reveal steady publication growth (from 20 to over 100 articles annually), increasing collaboration (2.39 authors per paper), substantial citation accumulation (2006–2008 works exceeding 3,000 citations), and diversification beyond anglophone regions. Temporal keyword trends trace thematic shifts from virtual worlds and MMOs to esports, ethics, gamification, and representation. These findings inform broader debates on how niche journals foster disciplinary legitimacy, showing that Games and Culture has been central to consolidating game studies and offers a transferable framework for examining institutionalization in other interdisciplinary domains.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Erkut Altındağ
Lecturer Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu
Games and Culture
Doğuş University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Altındağ et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69706d13b6488063ad5c1db8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120251413955
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: