What question did this study set out to answer?

This research examines how to distinguish objects both temporally and simultaneously, proposing a unified framework.

January 22, 2026Open Access

The Distinctness of Objects Near and Far

Key Points

This research examines how to distinguish objects both temporally and simultaneously, proposing a unified framework.
Analyzing metaphysical concepts of persistence and distinctness
Comparing diachronic (over time) and synchronic (at a time) perspectives
Arguing for a common framework for analyzing distinctness
Establishes criteria for distinguishing objects at a given time
Demonstrates the interrelation of diachronic and synchronic distinctness
Concludes that both forms of distinctness can share a unified analysis

Abstract

ABSTRACT Philosophers working on the metaphysics of persistence typically do not extend their views to the distinctness of objects at a single time. I argue that we can provide criteria to distinguish objects across time if and only if we can provide criteria to distinguish objects at a time. Furthermore, I endorse a stronger claim. If either diachronic or synchronic distinctness facts have an analysis, then they have a common analysis. In other words, we should analyze diachronic and synchronic distinctness facts in the same way.

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Authors

Erica Shumener

Journals

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research

Actions

Institutions

Syracuse University

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

The Distinctness of Objects Near and Far

Key Points

Abstract

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Authors

Journals

Actions

Institutions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study