ABSTRACT: This research addresses the effectiveness of public policies in promoting fundamental rights, based on the Giftedean neoperspectivist paradigm to understand the social and legal complexity of the issue. It is contextualized in the contemporary scenario of the search for social justice and inclusion, facing challenges arising from institutional limitations and the need for multidisciplinary integration. The central problem focuses on the insufficiency of traditional approaches to guarantee the effectiveness of these policies, motivating the general objective of analyzing, through theoretical triangulation, how inclusive practices can be improved to ensure rights and social justice. Methodologically, the Giftedean neoperspectivist paradigm was adopted, combining critical and social theories to support the analysis. The hypothetical-deductive method guided the investigative stages, while the bibliographic and documentary narrative review was conducted in databases such as Scopus, Web of Science and SciELO, using specific descriptors related to inclusion, human rights and public policies. The final analysis covered 45 high-impact studies. The main findings indicate the importance of epistemological self-management and theoretical integration to overcome institutional obstacles and promote more effective policies. It was concluded that multidimensional approaches broaden the understanding and practical application of rights. The gaps point to the need for longitudinal studies and greater theoretical diversity. Among the limitations are the restricted geographic scope and the lack of primary data. The contributions lie in theoretical and methodological innovation, offering subsidies for academia, managers and society. The added value lessons in the promotion of more inclusive practices and guidance for transformative public policies.
Breviário et al. (Sat,) studied this question.