ABSTRACT: This research addresses access to justice for people with dual status of giftedness associated with disability, a topic of increasing relevance in view of the legal and social challenges faced by this population. It is contextualized in the insufficiency of public policies and procedural adaptations that guarantee equity and inclusion, according to the current regulatory framework, including the Brazilian Federal Constitution and international human rights treaties. The central problem lies in the institutional and social barriers that limit the effectiveness of access to justice for these individuals, who are often invisible in the traditional legal system. The general objective was to analyze the legal, social and practical conditions to ensure inclusive justice for this specific group. To this end, the Giftedean neoperspectivist paradigm was adopted, which recognizes the coexistence of multiple truths and values diversity and justice, supported by theories of neurodiversity, human rights and social inclusion. The hypothetical-deductive method guided the investigation, complemented by a rigorous narrative bibliographic and documentary review, carried out in the SciELO, Scopus and Web of Science databases, with descriptors such as “neurodiversity”, “dual status” and “access to justice”, resulting in the analysis of 45 high-impact papers. The main findings indicate a gap between legislation and practice, highlighting the need for normative adaptation and specialized training. The conclusions point to the transformative potential of neurodiversity applied to law, despite the gaps in specific legislation and empirical research. Limitations included the scarcity of primary data and interdisciplinary complexity. The research contributes theoretically by integrating neuroscience and law, methodologically by integrated review, and empirically by mapping barriers and inclusive strategies, adding value to the legal field, science and society.
Breviário et al. (Sat,) studied this question.