Modern physics rests on a small number of well-established structural principles, including microscopic reversibility, macroscopic irreversibility, and geometric constraint through spacetime. What is less often made explicit is the finite domain of validity of macroscopic identity itself—the fact that coarse-grained descriptions remain meaningful only for limited durations under accumulated irreversible change. This work presents a conservative architectural formulation in which finite macroscopic identity is treated as an explicit structural constraint alongside reversibility, irreversibility, and geometry. No new dynamical laws are proposed, and no modifications to quantum theory, thermodynamics, or general relativity are introduced. Instead, the framework makes explicit a limitation already implicit in macroscopic physical description across domains. The formulation is descriptive rather than predictive and is intended to clarify the structural conditions under which macroscopic physics is expressible in observed reality. Illustrative examples are drawn from thermodynamics, stellar evolution, black hole horizons, materials science, and biological systems. A unitary toy model of black hole evaporation is included as a consistency check. The work is presented as a conceptual and architectural contribution, not as a theory of dynamics or a proposal for new physical mechanisms.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dimitri Cerny
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dimitri Cerny (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6978551eccb046adae51752c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18364255
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: