What question did this study set out to answer?

The commentary aims to highlight the importance of diverse interventions for trauma-related disorders.

February 2, 2026

There is no one-size-fits-all in the treatment of trauma-related disorders: Commentary on Rubenstein et al. (2024).

HFHong Wang Fung EWEdward K. S. WangHarvard University JWJanet Yuen-Ha Wong

Key Points

The commentary aims to highlight the importance of diverse interventions for trauma-related disorders.
Reviewed psychological theories related to clinical applications for trauma treatment
Discussed the roles of trauma-focused and nontrauma-focused treatments
Evaluated acceptance and commitment therapy and social-interpersonal interventions
Trauma-focused exposure therapy remains effective but not the only option
Nontrauma-focused interventions can significantly benefit recovery
Diverse needs of trauma survivors must be recognized for optimal treatment

Abstract

Recently, Rubenstein et al. (2024) published an article in American Psychologist providing a comprehensive review of psychological theories that underpin clinical applications and practices for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. The article highlights the roles that both trauma-focused and nontrauma-focused treatments can play in the recovery journey of trauma survivors. In this commentary, we further discuss the benefits and roles of nontrauma-focused interventions, such as acceptance and commitment therapy and social-interpersonal interventions. While trauma-focused exposure therapy remains an evidence-based approach, it is essential to recognize the diverse needs of trauma survivors and develop and evaluate other intervention approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper