Abstract OBJECTIVES Anatomic repair is the contemporary preferred management strategy for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA). Most outcome data derive from small single-centre series. This study aims to review long-term outcomes of surgical treatment in a multicentre cohort of ccTGA patients in the Netherlands over a 28-year period. METHODS All patients with ccTGA undergoing anatomic repair (double switch repair, arterial switch operation with hemi-Mustard/bidirectional Glenn, or Rastelli/Nikaidoh with Mustard or hemi-Mustard/bidirectional Glenn) between 1997 and 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Sixty-two patients underwent anatomic repair at a median age of 2.5 (IQR 1.4–4.0) years. Overall hospital mortality was 6.5%, decreasing to 1.9% after 2006. At a median follow-up of 11.9 years, 20-year survival exceeded 80%. Reoperation was required in 31%, most often for conduit replacement after Rastelli/Nikaidoh, baffle obstruction or neoaortic valve/root disease after double switch, and least after the arterial switch with hemi-Mustard/bidirectional Glenn (11.7%). Percutaneous interventions were performed in 16%. Complete atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation occurred in one-third, while late atrial arrhythmias were infrequent (10%). At latest follow-up, systemic left ventricular function was preserved in most patients, with only 2 patients showing moderate dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS After an initial learning curve, anatomic ccTGA repair has low operative mortality, good long-term survival, and preserved systemic left ventricular function in the majority of patients. Reintervention rates are considerable.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Roel van der Palen
Kirolos A. Jacob
Irene M. Kuipers
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Leiden University Medical Center
Loyola University Medical Center
Hubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Palen et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fcb6c1c9540dea80e74b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezag044