TEERAI‐pre achieved 75.0% accuracy in classifying mitral valve repair suitability in an internal dataset, outperforming intermediate and junior echocardiologists.
Does a multiview artificial intelligence model (TEERAI-pre) accurately predict morphological suitability for transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair from echocardiography compared to expert cardiologists?
783 patients (633 in internal dataset, 150 in external dataset) with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation being evaluated for transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair
TEERAI-pre, a video vision transformer-based multiview artificial intelligence model using multiview, multimodal echocardiography
Reference standards provided by 2 experienced valvular cardiologists per international guidelines, and intermediate/junior echocardiologists
Morphological suitability for transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (classification into red [unsuitable], yellow [challenging], and green [ideal] zones)surrogate
The TEERAI-pre AI model demonstrates strong accuracy in assessing morphological suitability for transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair using echocardiography, matching senior expert performance.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Background Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge mitral valve repair is a key therapeutic option for patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation at high surgical risk. This prospective study aimed to develop a novel end‐to‐end deep learning model for preoperative artificial intelligence assessment in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge mitral valve repair (TEERAI‐pre) candidates using multiview, multimodal echocardiography. Methods TEERAI‐pre, a video vision transformer–based classification model, predicts morphological suitability for transcatheter edge‐to‐edge mitral valve repair from multiview, multimodal echocardiography. A transformer‐based feature‐level fusion module was designed in TEERAI‐pre to integrate multiview, multimodal features for final prediction. An internal data set of 633 patients (7997 transthoracic echocardiographic videos; 766 pulsed‐wave Doppler images) was split for 5‐fold cross‐validation. An external data set of 150 patients (1735 transthoracic echocardiographic videos; 169 pulsed‐wave Doppler images) across 2 hospitals evaluated generalizability. Reference standards were provided by 2 experienced valvular cardiologists per international guidelines. Results On the internal data set, TEERAI‐pre achieved 75.0% accuracy (95% CI, 71.7%–78.4%) for classifying red (unsuitable), yellow (challenging), and green (ideal) zones, with 77.1% precision, 75.5% recall, and 76.2% F1 score. External validation yielded 73.3% accuracy, 74.0% precision, and 74.0% recall. Multiview multimodal integration improved performance. Binary classification (red versus green) showed TEERAI‐pre matched senior experts and outperformed intermediate/junior echocardiologists. Feature‐level fusion outperformed output‐level fusion and single‐view model. Backbone selection and calibration analysis confirmed robust performance. Conclusions TEERAI‐pre demonstrates strong performance in transcatheter edge‐to‐edge mitral valve repair preoperative assessment using transthoracic echocardiographic videos and images, supporting more accurate patient selection and enhancing clinical workflow efficiency. Registration URL: clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT05508438.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hui Li
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Yida Chen
Shenzhen University
Jialin Zhang
Second Military Medical University
Journal of the American Heart Association
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Shenzhen University
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Li et al. (Fri,) reported a other. TEERAI‐pre achieved 75.0% accuracy in classifying mitral valve repair suitability in an internal dataset, outperforming intermediate and junior echocardiologists.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe00c1c9540dea80fc55 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.044333