Background: Background radiation has over the years become a public health concern. It is therefore, imperative to ascertain its levels within strategic areas in our radiology facility for monitoring and compliance with international standards. Objectives: To determine the background radiation levels in the Radiology Department of Federal Medical Centre (FMC), Keffi, Nigeria. Methodology: The design was prospective and cross-sectional and involved the measurement of background radiation levels at various locations in the radiology department. Calibrated thermo Scientific RadEye TM B20 / B20-ER survey meter, an associated scalar counter, and a stopwatch, were used for measurements at each point, based on standard guidelines recommended by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Results: The least mean radiation (0.11µSv/hr) was detected in the computed tomography (CT) suite while the maximum value (0.13µSv/hr) emanated from the radiographers' common room. The coefficient of variation for the Chief Radiographers office, Head of Department's office and the Radiologist’s office were similar 8.3%. The radiographers’ common room was slightly higher (10.9%). The main diagnostic room and seminar room had 16.7%, while it was 9.09% for the CT suite. The standard error ranged between 0.002 and 0.004. There was statistically significant difference in all test values at a level of significance of 5% (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Background radiation values obtained were within recommended standards. However, there is need for regular radiation monitoring as part of radiation safety culture in our radiology facility.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eshiett Peter
Joseph Dlama Zira
Egga Anita
University of Maiduguri
Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University
Federal Medical Centre
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe35c1c9540dea810231 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.82547/jrrs.vol29no1.104
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: