Abstract: Physicalism—the view that reality is fundamentally physical and that consciousness is derivative or reducible—now functions less as a defended thesis than as the background assumption of serious intellectual discourse. This essay does not argue for or against physicalism's truth. It asks a different question: how did this particular metaphysical framework come to feel like common sense rather than doctrine? The answer is not primarily philosophical. Physicalism's dominance emerged from a convergence of methodological success, political and religious pressures, industrial transformation, institutional incentives, and cultural shifts—until its status as a metaphysical position faded from view. Understanding this history does not refute physicalism, but it does reveal its contingency. What feels inevitable is shown to be historically situated. This clarity is a precondition for responsible inquiry. Part of the Return to Consciousness research program—18 philosophical essays exploring consciousness-first metaphysics. Full project: https://brunoton.github.io/return-to-consciousness/
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bruno Tonetto
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bruno Tonetto (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe7cc1c9540dea8109a1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18431069
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: