Patients with cardiorenal disease, including heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD)
Steroidal MRAs, non-steroidal MRAs, and aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs)
This narrative review highlights the evolving landscape of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism, noting that non-steroidal MRAs and aldosterone synthase inhibitors may overcome the safety limitations of traditional steroidal MRAs in cardiorenal disease.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores the evolution of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in cardiorenal disease, comparing steroidal MRAs with newer non-steroidal MRAs and emerging aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs). It examines their efficacy, safety, and positioning in heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), aiming to guide optimal treatment across cardiorenal diseases. RECENT FINDINGS: Steroidal MRAs remain foundational in HF with reduced ejection fraction, but are underused due to hyperkalemia, worsening renal function, and hormonal side effects. Non-steroidal MRAs have demonstrated cardiorenal benefits in high-risk populations (e.g. diabetic kidney disease) while mitigating some safety concerns. Emerging ASIs directly inhibit aldosterone synthase, reducing aldosterone levels and potentially preventing breakthrough. Ongoing trials are further defining their roles as standalone or combination therapies. Non-steroidal MRAs expand the use of mineralocorticoid receptor blockade into populations underserved by steroidal agents. Ongoing studies will establish the role of direct aldosterone synthase inhibition.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jonas Erzeel
Marnicq Van Es
M Dupont
Current Heart Failure Reports
Hasselt University
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Erzeel et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75f14c6e9836116a2a34d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-026-00740-5
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: