As a natural building material, rammed earth has gained significant attention due to its environmental friendliness, low cost, and sustainability. This study conducted a dynamic simulation of heat and moisture transfer in rammed earth and brick buildings to compare their energy performance under identical conditions. The results indicated that the annual minimum indoor temperature in rammed earth buildings was 0.7 °C higher, while the maximum was 0.4 °C lower than that in brick buildings. The minimum and maximum indoor relative humidities were 11.4% higher and 9.6% lower, respectively, in rammed earth buildings, with an annual average of 69.2%, which is slightly lower than that of brick buildings. The annual heating and cooling energy consumption in brick buildings was 1.37 and 1.2 times greater, respectively, than in rammed earth buildings, and their monthly dehumidification demands were consistently higher. The effect of wall thickness on energy consumption revealed that increasing the thickness from 200 to 250 mm reduced energy use by 9.3%, whereas an increase from 450 to 500 mm yielded a 4.2% reduction. When the wall thickness exceeded 400 mm, the energy savings were marginal (<5%), whereas the construction costs and space occupancy increased. Therefore, a wall thickness of 350–400 mm is recommended to optimize the trade-off between energy efficiency, thermal-moisture performance, and cost-effectiveness.
Jiang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.