In the rapidly urbanizing Global South, megacities face a perplexing “paradox of idleness”: acute land scarcity in the urban core coexisting with inefficient rural homesteads in the hinterland. Using Shanghai as a representative case, this study integrates spatial autocorrelation analysis with Geographical Detector modeling to quantify the spatial differentiation patterns and driving mechanisms of this phenomenon. The results reveal a distinct core-periphery gradient, with vacancy density increasing from the inner suburbs to the remote hinterland. Four regional typologies were identified: dispersed-inefficient, high-density accumulation, sparse-stable, and intensive-efficient. Quantitative analysis identifies demographic aging and low agricultural efficiency as dominant drivers. Counter-intuitively, the study finds that top-down institutional pilots alone exert a negligible direct impact. Instead, interaction analysis confirms a significant policy-bundling effect, in which institutional tools promote revitalization only when coupled with economic and locational incentives. These findings expose a mechanism of “involuntary vacancy” trapped by institutional rigidity, distinct from the market-driven abandonment seen in shrinking or remote Western contexts. Consequently, a gradient-based governance framework is proposed to transition from “one-size-fits-all” regulation to targeted spatial restructuring pathways.
Li et al. (Sat,) studied this question.