This paper examines agentic AI systems that internally delegate tasks by instantiating sub-agents. It frames the resulting risks as problems of delegation, authority, and accountability rather than autonomy or emergent intelligence. The work maps these systems to the requirements of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 for Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS) and outlines governance controls applicable under existing standards, including bounded delegation, non-delegable authority, admissibility prior to execution, lifecycle revocation, and audit-sufficient evidence. The paper is intended to support enterprise deployment, regulatory scrutiny, and continual improvement without relying on speculative assumptions about future AI capabilities.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Anthony MacFarland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Anthony MacFarland (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69843433f1d9ada3c1fb2034 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18454780
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: